BlogBest Website Translation Tools in 2026

Best Website Translation Tools in 2026

Compare 17 website translation tools, software and platforms by delivery method, price, SEO support and review. Updated September 2026. Try Smartcat free.

Maksym Ostapenko is Head of Product Growth at Smartcat, where he works on product growth, AI translation workflows, website localization, and enterprise localization solutions. He writes about translation technology, localization operations, AI-powered content workflows, and product strategy based on hands-on growth and product experience.

Learn about our editorial policies

27 min read

Try Smartcat

See how your team can translate everything, in every language your customers speak.

Book a demo

Start free trial

No credit card - 15-day trial

Last updated 30 September 2026: added a comparison table, a team-fit table, a section on delivery methods and an FAQ. Pricing re-checked against each vendor's public pricing page.

Website translation software finds the pages on your site, translates them and serves each language version to visitors and search engines. Businesses looking to localize their website will be met with lots of website translation tools and platforms to choose from, and no single tool fits every team. The best tool depends on how it delivers translated pages, and on your localization needs.

For example, the best translation tool for a SaaS company will be different from the one a small-sized business needs to expand into new markets, which again will be different from a multi-national corporation with a worldwide presence.

However, some of the things are common when looking for a translation tool. You expect the translation tool to provide or excel in translation accuracy, fluency, translation memory, glossary, dynamic content handling, SEO, and CMS compatibility, among other things.

Website translation software at a glance

Tool

How it delivers translated pages

Starting price (public)

Free option

Multilingual SEO

Human review

Best for

Smartcat

JavaScript snippet, optional SEO proxy, CMS connectors (Anticipate plan and above)

From $1,200/year (Adapt, 100,000 Smartwords)

15-day trial, 15,000 Smartwords, no card

Yes, with SEO Proxy (subdirectory or subdomain URLs)

Yes: in-context review plus Marketplace linguists

Teams that want snippet speed, SEO URLs and review in one platform

Articulate

Not a website tool (e-learning course localization)

From $1,449/seat/year (Articulate 360 AI Personal)

14-day trial

No

Not stated on pricing page

Translating e-learning courses, not websites

ChatGPT

None: chat assistant, no website delivery

Go $8/month (US); Business $20/seat/month billed annually

Free plan, usage-limited

No

No

Drafting or rewriting individual pages

DeepL

Machine translation engine and API only

Pro from $8.74/month billed annually; API Growth from $26/month

Free translator, 50,000 characters/month

No

No

The engine behind another tool

Google Cloud Translation API

Machine translation API only

$20 per 1M characters

First 500,000 characters/month free

No

No

Developers building their own pipeline

Microsoft Translator (Azure Translator)

Machine translation API only

$10 per 1M characters

2M characters/month free (F0 tier)

No

No

Teams already on Azure

Lokalise

TMS with CMS and code integrations

From $149/month billed annually

14-day trial, no card

No: your CMS publishes the pages

Reviewer workflow

Product and engineering teams

Phrase

TMS with connectors

Freelancer $27/month; Team from $1,245/month billed annually

14-day trial

No

Yes: professional translation from $0.06/word (Phrase Strings)

Large localization programs

RWS Trados

TMS and CAT tool, no website delivery

Trados Go $35/month billed annually; team plans quoted

14-day trial

No

Reviewer mode; no marketplace

Professional translators and LSPs

Smartling

Hosted proxy (Global Delivery Network), CMS connectors, TMS

Custom quote

Core plan “free to start” (limits not stated)

Yes, via Global Delivery Network

Yes: Smartling translation services

Enterprise programs that need governance

Crowdin

TMS with 700+ integrations

Pro $50/month billed annually

Free plan, 60,000 hosted words

No

Yes: vendor marketplace

Developer-led and open-source projects

Transifex (XTM Transifex)

JavaScript snippet (Transifex Live) and TMS

Custom quote (volume-based)

None stated

Not stated

Yes: review workflows

Software and documentation teams

XTM

TMS with connectors

Custom quote

Trial available

No

Yes: workflow review steps

High-volume enterprise translation

memoQ

TMS with connectors

TMS Starter €2,750/year (about $3,025)

30-day trial

No

Reviewer roles; no marketplace

LSPs and in-house translator teams

Weglot

JavaScript snippet, hosted subdomain or subdirectory, CMS plugins

Starter $17/month or $170/year

Free plan: 2,000 words, 1 language

Yes: hreflang, language URLs, translated metadata

Yes: professional translators on Business and above

Small and mid-size sites that want no-code setup

Localize

JavaScript snippet

Custom quote

14-day trial, no card

Claimed (“Advanced SEO”); details not published

AI plus human review

SaaS products and web apps

Translated

Human translation service, CMS connectors, API; Lara for AI translation

Human translation about $0.10/word on average; Lara Pro $9.99/month billed annually

Lara free plan

Not stated

Yes: professional translators

Quality-critical content with human translators

Prices are the lowest public list price on each vendor’s own pricing page, checked 30 September 2026, in US dollars unless noted. “Custom quote” means the vendor does not publish a price. ChatGPT pricing is from OpenAI’s plan announcement.

Which website translation platform fits your team?

Start from the team that will run the work, not from the feature list. The delivery method that suits that team narrows 17 tools to two or three.

Your team

What matters most

Delivery method

Tools to shortlist

Marketing team on a CMS or site builder (WordPress, Webflow, Wix, Squarespace)

Launch fast, no developer time, review on the live page

JavaScript snippet, plus an SEO proxy for indexable URLs

Smartcat, Weglot, Localize

Product and engineering team (app strings, docs in Git)

Repository sync, continuous releases, developer workflow

TMS with code-repository integrations

Lokalise, Crowdin, Transifex, Phrase

Enterprise with a headless or enterprise CMS (Contentful, AEM, Sitecore)

Native locale pages, governance, vendor management

CMS connector feeding a TMS

Smartling, XTM, Phrase, Smartcat

Regulated or high-stakes content (legal, medical, financial)

Named human reviewers, audit trail

Platform plus professional linguists

Translated, RWS Trados, Smartcat with Marketplace linguists

With these factors in mind, here are our top picks.

#1. Smartcat

Smartcat is a script-based translation tool suitable for businesses looking to take their website multilingual.

Unlike typical localization tools, Smartcat works directly on the rendered page. The tool doesn’t require any changes to the CMS or codebase. In default snippet mode your URLs stay as they are; turn on the optional SEO Proxy and each translated page gets its own subdirectory (yoursite.com/fr/) or subdomain (fr.yoursite.com) URL that search engines can index.

Smartcat translates content by adding a short JavaScript snippet to the site. Once installed, it automatically detects visible content on the browser page, translates it using AI, and then serves localized content to visitors in their preferred language.

The visual editor detects translatable text automatically, including dropdown menus and other interactive elements, and lets reviewers edit each translation in place on the page. The platform supports multiple translation engines and picks the best for each language pair. It also provides translation memory, glossaries, and a human review option.

“Switching to Smartcat during our Contentful CMS migration completely saved our timeline. The integration made everything so much quicker — we actually met our website launch deadline, which wouldn’t have been possible with our previous provider.”

— Magdalena Tumulka, Localization Manager, Huel. Huel cut website localization from 13–18 hours a month to a couple of minutes through Smartcat’s Contentful integration. Read the Huel case study.

Key Features

  • Script-based website translation

  • In-context visual editor, including dropdowns and interactive elements

  • Multi-engine AI translation

  • Translation memory and glossaries (TMX or XLSX import)

  • Human review workflows, with Marketplace linguists on every plan

  • Optional SEO Proxy: translated URLs by subdirectory or subdomain

  • CMS-independent implementation; CMS connectors (Contentful, WPML, Drupal, AEM, Sitecore) on the Anticipate plan and above

  • Pricing: Adapt plan from $1,200/year with 100,000 Smartwords; free trial of 15,000 Smartwords over 15 days

Pros

  • Works independently of the CMS (WordPress, Shopify, Webflow, React)

  • Requires minimal engineering team involvement

  • Supports dynamic and JavaScript-rendered content

  • Supports glossary and translation memory

  • Scales well for multilingual websites

Cons

  • Your site must allow a JavaScript snippet in its header

  • Right-to-left layouts: text direction switches automatically, but some sites need manual layout adjustments

  • Text inside images is handled by the separate Image Translator, not the website project

  • CMS connectors are only on the Anticipate plan and above; smaller plans use the snippet

  • Plans start at $1,200/year, which is more than very small sites may need

#2. Articulate

Articulate 360 is an e-learning platform which also provides localization for online training courses. It isn't a website translation tool in the traditional sense, but many businesses use it to translate multilingual training materials, onboarding programs, and education content.

However, unlike tools like Smartcat, Articulate only translates text. All other file types require manual export and reinsertion.

The supported languages are limited, there’s no adaptive learning, and the tool lacks collaboration and automation workflows. In addition, Articulate’s pricing is opaque with its per-seat or per-course charges.

Key Features

  • Course localization

  • Rise 360 translation support

  • Multilingual course publishing

  • Specialized translation for courses and education content

Pros

  • Strong support for multilingual training content

  • Widely used in corporate learning environments

  • Easy localization workflow for courses

  • Integrates well with learning programs

Cons

  • Text-only translation

  • Not a website translation platform

  • Static engine with no adaptive learning

  • Requires external translation workflows

  • No multilingual SEO features

  • Not suitable for translating websites or web applications

#3. ChatGPT

ChatGPT can be used as a website translation tool by translating website content manually using just prompts. It’s easy to use, requires no coding or complex setup, and uses natural language prompts.

While ChatGPT is an easy-to-use tool for quick translation, it can’t handle an entire website translation by itself. The LLM is great for a quick manual copy-paste translation. But that’s where its convenience ends.

The translations won’t have any translation memory, glossary or consistent terminology, review layer, or workflow automations. Also, ChatGPT may use the data for its LLM training.

For businesses and enterprises, ChatGPT alone won’t be sufficient for website translation. You would need to develop or use another tool to deploy and manage translations on the website.

Key Features

  • Natural language prompting

  • Tone and style customization

  • Context-aware translations

  • Brand voice adaptation

  • Multilingual content generation

Pros

  • Easy to use and quick translations

  • Can be prompted to suit tone, style, and branding

  • Useful for marketing and creative content

  • Supports custom instructions and prompts

Cons

  • Not a dedicated website translation platform

  • No translation memory by default

  • No built-in website deployment capabilities

  • Requires manual workflows for large websites

  • Translation quality can vary depending on prompts

#4. DeepL

DeepL is widely regarded as one of the best machine translation engines available today, particularly for European languages.

However, DeepL is a translation engine and not a website translation platform. You can copy-paste the content, and DeepL translates it to different languages (excellently at that). But that’s where it ends. You get the translated content from DeepL, and you then need to build or use another tool as a layer to manage website translation.

Businesses and enterprises need more than a translation engine. They need consistency across the website, a system to collaborate, and workflows to manage all the translation content.

DeepL also lacks dynamic content translation, manual editing, synchronization, and workflow automations. Add to it, the maximum file size and the number of global languages supported are quite limited as well.

Key Features

  • Neural machine translation

  • Terminology management

  • Translation API

  • Document translation

  • Custom glossaries

  • Multiple language support

Pros

  • Excellent translation quality

  • Natural-sounding output

  • Strong terminology controls

  • Easy API integration

  • Popular among professional translators

Cons

  • Not a complete website translation platform

  • Limited workflow automation

  • No built-in website localization infrastructure

  • Lacks advanced collaboration and review features

  • Limited file type, size, and languages supported

#5. Google MT / Google Translate API

Google’s Cloud Translation API is Google's machine translation that allows developers and teams to add translation capabilities directly into websites and applications.

Again, typical of thesis machine translators, Google's API focuses purely on translation and leaves implementation, content management, review workflows, and website localization to the business.

So, the translation here lacks terminology controls, complex file type or dynamic content handling, and manual check or review workflows. In addition, Google may use the website content and translation data for its training purposes.

Key Features

  • Machine translation API

  • Large language coverage

  • Custom translation models

  • Real-time translation

  • Developer-friendly integrations

Pros

  • Easy to integrate into custom applications

  • Supports a large number of languages

  • Highly scalable infrastructure

  • Flexible API-based implementation

  • Pay-as-you-go pricing model

Cons

  • Not a complete website translation platform

  • Requires development resources to implement

  • Limited localization workflow management

  • No built-in human review process

  • Multilingual SEO must be handled separately

#6. Microsoft Translator

Microsoft Translator is a cloud-based machine translation tool, similar to Google MT. Since it’s a part of the Microsoft Azure ecosystem, it is often used by businesses already invested in Microsoft technologies and looking to add translation capabilities to their workflows.

While it’s common for enterprises to use Microsoft Translator as part of the Microsoft technology bundle, it has lots of limitations, though. As seen with other MT models, businesses still need additional tools for a robust website localization.

The Microsoft Translator comes with no translation memory, no glossary or terminology controls, and no review layers. Add to it, the translation is text inputs only . And Microsoft may use the data and content given for translation.

Key Features

  • Machine translation API

  • Azure integration

  • Large language coverage

Pros

  • Strong integration with Microsoft products

  • Easy API implementation

  • Supports a wide range of languages

  • Scalable cloud infrastructure

  • Custom translation capabilities

Cons

  • Not a complete website translation platform

  • Requires development resources for implementation

  • Limited localization workflow management

  • No built-in multilingual SEO capabilities

  • Human review processes must be managed separately

#7. Lokalise

Lokalise is a translation platform built primarily for software localization. Businesses looking to translate software or developer-centric websites are their target audience.

Lokalise is a great fit for jargon-heavy SaaS tools and websites. The translation workflows focus on developers and product managers. Lokalise also provides integrations with tools like GitHub, GitLab, Figma, Jira, and Slack, which make it easier to automate translations as part of the development cycle.

While Lokalise can handle translation for diverse websites, it's most suited for businesses where localization is closely tied to software products. The tool doesn’t support image or video translations. It also lacks adaptive AI translation, which is only offered as a paid add-on, unlike as an in-built feature in other tools like Smartcat.

Key Features

  • GitHub and GitLab integrations

  • Figma localization workflows

  • Continuous localization automation

  • Translation memory

  • Developer API

  • Team collaboration tools

Pros

  • Excellent developer workflow integrations

  • Strong design-to-development localization process

  • Supports continuous localization

  • Easy collaboration across teams

  • Well-suited for SaaS companies

Cons

  • Less focused on website localization specifically

  • Limited SEO-focused website translation features

  • Can be a poor fit for marketing websites

  • No image or video translation support

  • Enterprise features like Adaptive AI increase costs quickly

#8. Phrase

Phrase, also called Memsource, is another well-known localization platform. The tool helps businesses manage translations across websites, applications, documentation, and other digital content from a single centralized system.

Phrase positions its localization as a "control tower," where it gives the businesses control over large-scale, complex multilingual translations. It does so with deep integrations across CMS platforms, developer tools, and translation providers.

Phrase is a capable translation tool. But businesses and enterprise teams consistently hit the same hurdles here. The tool’s add-on fees balloon the budgets, limited real-time collaboration capabilities, no integrated linguist marketplace, and vendor management is handled entirely outside the platform.

Key Features

  • Centralized localization management

  • Translation memory and terminology management

  • Workflow automation

  • CMS and developer tool integrations

  • Quality assurance tools

  • Analytics and reporting

Pros

  • Strong workflow orchestration capabilities

  • Extensive integration ecosystem

  • Suitable for complex localization programs

  • Good visibility across multilingual projects

  • Supports both technical and non-technical teams

Cons

  • More focused on localization management than website translation

  • Can be complex for smaller teams

  • No integrated marketplace

  • Invoicing and payments are managed externally

  • Vendor management is handled outside the platform

  • Enterprise-oriented pricing structure

#9. RWS - Trados

RWS Trados is one of the established names when it comes to traditional translation approaches. It’s a well-known tool among professional translators.

RWS Trados uses computer-assisted translation (CAT) technology and helps translators and linguists improve consistency, productivity, and translation quality with their reusable language assets.

This tool is a great option in the traditional translation ecosystem, but businesses looking for automated website localization might need additional tools. The traditional translation approach comes with lots of limitations in a post-AI translation ecosystem. As such, downsides of RWS Trados include manual workflows, hidden fees, and limited visibility into your own projects.

Key Features

  • Translation memory

  • Terminology management

  • CAT tool environment

  • Quality assurance tools

  • Project management capabilities

  • Cloud collaboration features

Pros

  • Trusted by professional translators worldwide

  • Extensive translation memory capabilities

  • Mature terminology management tools

  • Large ecosystem of language resources

  • Strong quality control features

Cons

  • Not designed specifically for website translation

  • Limited website automation capabilities

  • Steeper learning curve for non-translators

  • Often requires additional tools for website localization workflows

#10. Smartling

Smartling is a translation tool aimed at enterprises managing multilingual websites, marketing campaigns, and automations at scale.

The platform offers lots of customizations and automations, including configurable workflows, approval chains, quality assurance checkpoints, marketing automations, and deep CMS integrations.

The platform’s strength lies in extensive integration. It connects with major CMS platforms, ecommerce systems, and marketing tools, allowing content to move easily through translation workflows.

The platform is enterprise-focused, though. While it makes a great tool for large organizations, smaller teams may find it unnecessarily complex and more resource-intensive than the tools designed for faster translation and deployment.

Key Features

  • Enterprise localization workflows

  • Automated content synchronization

  • Quality assurance checkpoints

  • Translation memory management

  • CMS and MarTech integrations

  • Workflow automation

Pros

  • Strong governance and workflow controls

  • Extensive integration ecosystem

  • Excellent for large-scale localization programs

  • Mature quality assurance features

  • Scales effectively across global teams

Cons

  • More complex than website-focused tools

  • Higher learning curve for smaller teams

  • Enterprise-oriented pricing

  • May require dedicated localization resources

#11. Crowdin

Crowdin is a developer-focused localization platform built around automation and continuous localization.

The tool is best-suited for software companies, SaaS businesses, and open-source projects. These projects need translations to keep updating with rapidly changing products and content.

Crowdin supports websites, applications, documentation, and software products. For businesses that view translation as a continuous part of product development rather than a one-off content project, this tool makes a great fit.

Key Features

  • Continuous localization workflows

  • GitHub and GitLab integrations

  • Automated content synchronization

  • Translation memory

  • In-context editing

  • API and developer tools

Pros

  • Excellent automation capabilities

  • Strong developer ecosystem

  • Supports continuous localization workflows

  • Scales well for rapidly changing content

  • Popular among SaaS and software companies

Cons

  • Less focused on marketing website localization

  • Can feel technical for non-developer teams

  • Advanced workflows may require setup

  • SEO-focused website features are less comprehensive than dedicated website translation tools

#12. Transifex

Transifex offers continuous translation workflows for software products, documentation, knowledge bases, and customer-facing digital content.

The tool focuses a lot on continuous localization and in-context translations. As a result, it works best for product documentation, support articles, and synchronized content across multiple languages.

Key Features

  • Continuous localization workflows

  • In-context translation editor

  • Translation memory

  • Content synchronization automation

  • Developer integrations

  • Documentation localization

Pros

  • Strong documentation localization capabilities

  • Excellent in-context editing experience

  • Automates translation updates effectively

  • Well-suited for SaaS businesses

  • Supports multiple content types from a single platform

Cons

  • Less specialized for website localization alone

  • Fewer enterprise governance features than some competitors

  • Advanced workflows can require configuration

  • Pricing may be difficult to justify for smaller teams

#13. XTM

XTM is an enterprise translation management tool built for businesses handling large volumes of multilingual content. And across multiple departments, markets, and content types.

The tool supports complex and high-volume localization operations. So for large organizations with a strong presence worldwide, looking for an enterprise-level translation platform, XTM is a solid choice.

Key Features

  • Enterprise translation management

  • Workflow automation

  • Translation memory and terminology management

  • Quality assurance tools

  • Vendor and project management

  • Integration ecosystem

Pros

  • Built for large-scale localization programs

  • Highly customizable workflows

  • Strong terminology and translation memory features

  • Supports complex enterprise requirements

  • Scales effectively across global operations

Cons

  • Steep learning curve

  • More complex than most website translation tools

  • Requires significant setup and administration

  • May be excessive for small and mid-sized businesses

#14. memoQ

memoQ is a translation management and computer-assisted translation (CAT) platform. It’s a popular option among professional translators and language service providers.

memoQ is designed to improve translation quality, consistency, and collaboration across multilingual projects. Rather than focusing on website translation specifically.

Although memoQ can be used as part of a website localization workflow, it is best suited for businesses looking for a translator productivity and quality management tool, and not an automated website translation tool.

Key Features

  • Translation memory management

  • Terminology databases

  • Collaborative translation workflows

  • Quality assurance tools

  • Vendor management

  • CAT tool environment

Pros

  • Excellent translator collaboration features

  • Strong translation memory capabilities

  • Mature terminology management tools

  • Widely used across the localization industry

  • Supports high-quality translation workflows

Cons

  • Not a dedicated website translation platform

  • Limited website localization automation

  • Requires localization expertise to maximize value

  • Less suitable for teams seeking rapid website deployment

#15. Weglot

Weglot is another well-known website translation tool for businesses looking to make their websites multilingual with minimal setup.

The platform uses a lightweight integration approach through a JavaScript snippet, plugin, or connector, very similar to what other popular tools like Smartcat do. This lightweight approach makes it easy to implement for small businesses, startups, and marketing teams that need results quickly.

Weglot takes a simple and straightforward translation approach. It detects website content, translates it into multiple languages, and creates SEO-friendly language versions of pages. You can refine the translations manually later.

However, Weglot lacks many of the advanced translation features and workflows found in other localization platforms.

Key Features

  • No-code website translation

  • Automatic content detection

  • SEO-friendly translated pages

  • Visual translation editor

  • Language switcher

  • CMS and ecommerce integrations

Pros

  • Extremely fast implementation

  • Easy for non-technical teams to manage

  • Strong multilingual SEO capabilities

  • Supports major CMS and ecommerce platforms

  • Intuitive editing experience

Cons

  • Less flexible for complex localization workflows

  • Limited enterprise governance features

  • Costs can increase significantly for large websites

  • Fewer customization options than full localization platforms

#16. Localize

Localize, as the name says, is a localization platform mainly targeted at SaaS companies and web application teams. It’s a no-code translation tool for software companies to translate web apps, UI, help docs, and support articles.

The tool provides a good balance between automation and developer flexibility in content translation. It automatically detects and translates content, also providing in-context editors to make changes.

While it doesn’t offer lots of features like other alternatives, it gives a good developer-friendly localization option for businesses.

Key Features

  • Website and application localization

  • Automatic content detection

  • In-context editing

  • Translation memory

  • Developer API

  • Content synchronization

Pros

  • Easy to implement and maintain

  • Strong developer experience

  • Helpful in-context translation workflows

  • Suitable for web applications and SaaS products

  • Reduces manual localization work

Cons

  • Smaller integration ecosystem than larger competitors

  • Fewer enterprise workflow controls

  • Less comprehensive for large-scale localization programs

  • Can become costly as translation volume grows

#17. Translated

Translated positions itself as a "human-AI symbiosis.” It takes a different approach to translation by combining both AI-powered translations with professional human translators.

It focuses on delivering translation quality at scale through its human-AI collaboration model. So, it is an attractive translator option for businesses preferring translation quality and cultural accuracy over fully automated localization.

Key Features

  • Human-AI translation workflows

  • Professional translation services

  • Machine translation integration

  • Translation memory

  • Terminology management

  • Multilingual project management

Pros

  • Strong balance between speed and quality

  • Access to professional translators

  • High-quality output for customer-facing content

  • Supports large multilingual projects

  • Reduces manual translation effort

Cons

  • Less focused on website localization automation

  • Limited website-specific functionality

  • Human review can increase project costs

  • Not ideal for organizations seeking fully automated workflows

Snippet, proxy or CMS connector: how each method changes cost and SEO

Every tool on this list delivers translated pages in one of three ways. The method decides what you install, what Google can index, and what you keep paying for as the site changes. Most buying mistakes come from choosing a tool before choosing a method.

Method

What you install

What search engines index

Best when

JavaScript snippet

One script tag in the site header

Not the translations on their own

You need to launch fast, or the site is internal or gated

SEO proxy / translated URLs

The snippet plus a translated-URL setting

Each language at its own subdirectory or subdomain URL

Organic traffic in each market matters

CMS connector

A connector for your CMS

Native locale pages inside the CMS

The site is large and structured, and content lives in one CMS

JavaScript snippet: fastest to launch, not an SEO method on its own

A JavaScript snippet is one script tag in your site's header, and removing the tool means removing that line. Translations are swapped in inside the visitor's browser, so there is nothing to rebuild. The trade-off is search: translations that exist only in the browser are generally not indexed as separate language pages.

In Smartcat, the snippet serves static snapshots of each translated page stored in the cloud, so visitors don't call Smartcat live on every page view. On Wix and Squarespace the snippet goes in the site's custom-code or header code-injection settings.

SEO proxy or translated URLs: what makes each language indexable

To rank in another language, each translated page needs its own URL, either a subdirectory (yoursite.com/fr/) or a subdomain (fr.yoursite.com), plus hreflang so search engines know which version to show. A subdirectory inherits the main domain's authority; a subdomain is treated more like a separate site.

In Smartcat this is the optional SEO Proxy setting in the website project. Despite the name, it doesn't put Smartcat in front of your visitors: Smartcat does not host or proxy your live traffic.

CMS connector: native pages inside the CMS your team already uses

A CMS connector pulls content out of your CMS, sends it for translation and writes the translated versions back as native locale pages. No script renders anything, and the CMS's own URL and SEO settings apply. It is the heaviest setup but the cleanest result for large, structured sites.

Smartcat's CMS connectors, including Contentful, WPML, Drupal, Adobe Experience Manager and Sitecore, are on the Anticipate plan and above. Connectors can import your existing translations once, so only new or changed content is translated afterwards.

What each method costs as your site changes

Price the second month, not the first. A site that changes weekly re-sends content every week, and tools differ in what they charge for repeats. Machine translation APIs bill every character sent. Word-allowance plans count translated words against a quota.

In Smartcat, unchanged pages are not re-translated, and on current plans 100% translation-memory matches and repeated segments consume no Smartwords, so repeated navigation and footer text is paid for once.

Bottom line

So, which website translation tool should you choose?

Again, it entirely depends on your business requirements, localization goals, and technical constraints.

For large-scale, complex enterprise-level translations, Smartling or XTM are strong options.

For software companies and SaaS tools with developer-centric translation requirements, Lokalise or Crowdin might be a good fit.

But if you're looking for a website translation tool that provides easy localization without technical complexities, human review workflows, dynamic content handling, SEO support, and the flexibility to work with virtually any website stack, Smartcat is the strongest overall option.

Frequently asked questions about website translation software

What is the best website translation software?

The best website translation software is the one whose delivery method fits your site. Compare five things: how it publishes translated pages (snippet, SEO proxy or CMS connector), whether each language gets its own indexable URL, how human review works, how pricing grows as the site changes, and which CMS it connects to.

Smartcat suits teams that want snippet speed, SEO URLs and linguist review in one platform. Developer-led teams often prefer Lokalise or Crowdin.

Is there free website translation software?

Yes, with limits. Browser extensions and the Google Translate widget are free, but they translate for one visitor at a time and search engines never see the result. Several tools in the table above have free tiers or trials.

Smartcat's trial includes 15,000 Smartwords over 15 days, with no credit card. After the trial, paid plans start at $1,200/year.

How do I translate an entire website?

Pick a delivery method first, then let the tool discover your pages from a crawl, your sitemap or a URL list. Translate with your glossary and translation memory applied, review the high-value pages, and publish through a snippet, adding translated URLs if you want the pages indexed.

In Smartcat, enter your domain with a trailing wildcard (yourdomain.com/*) to crawl the whole site; a bare URL crawls only that one page.

Is AI website translation accurate enough to publish without human review?

For much of a website, yes. In 2026, 92% of words translated by Smartcat AI for paying customers were accepted without a single human edit.

Quality depends on your glossary and translation memory, and on the language pair. Legal, medical and brand-critical pages still warrant a human pass, which is why most teams review only their high-value pages and publish the rest.

Do I need a developer to translate my website?

Not for the snippet. It is one script tag in the site header, and site builders such as Wix and Squarespace take it through their custom-code settings. A developer or IT team is usually needed for translated URLs on a subdirectory or subdomain, and for installing a CMS connector on an enterprise CMS.

Which website translation tools handle multilingual SEO?

Look for three things: a separate URL for each language, hreflang annotations linking the versions, and translated titles and meta descriptions. Tools that only translate in the browser don't give search engines indexable pages.

The 'Multilingual SEO' column in the table above shows which tools provide translated URLs themselves. Smartcat does it through its optional SEO Proxy setting.

How much does website translation software cost?

It depends on the pricing model. Machine translation APIs charge per million characters, word-allowance tools charge monthly against a word quota, and enterprise platforms are usually quoted per contract.

Smartcat's Adapt plan starts at $1,200/year with 100,000 Smartwords. Compare the cost of your second month, when only changed content should be charged.

Website translation software or a website localization service: which do I need?

Software is a platform your team runs: it translates, you review and publish. A service is a team of people who do the work for you, usually per word. Many companies combine the two, with AI translating everything and professional linguists reviewing the pages that matter.

Smartcat pairs its platform with a Marketplace of vetted linguists, available on every plan.

Can I translate only some pages or languages first?

Yes. In Smartcat you can crawl a single URL or a section, and inclusion and exclusion rules decide which paths enter translation. Publish settings then choose which languages go live, so you can launch one market while others are still in review.

What happens to website translations we already have?

You can keep them. Smartcat imports translation memories as TMX (recommended) or XLSX files, and CMS connectors can import existing translations once, so only new or changed content is translated afterwards. Approved translations are reused instead of being translated again.

Does website translation software support right-to-left languages like Arabic?

Most full platforms do, but check the layout, not just the text. In Smartcat, text direction switches automatically for Arabic and Hebrew, and navigation adjusts. Some websites still need manual layout changes to render correctly, so review the translated pages before you publish.

How does Smartcat compare with Smartling for a CMS-heavy website?

Both connect to enterprise CMSs such as AEM, Sitecore and Contentful. Smartling is built around enterprise governance and quotes pricing per contract. Smartcat publishes its prices, adds a snippet option for sites without a connector, and includes a Marketplace of linguists.

For a detailed comparison, see Smartcat vs Smartling.

Question not covered? Talk to a localization specialist about your site, languages and CMS.

💌

Subscribe to our newsletter

Email *

Catherine Cohen
Edited by
Catherine Cohen

Catherine Cohen is a copywriter and content strategist with a background in B2B SaaS, business formation, legal tech, and AI. As Smartcat’s Content Marketing Specialist, she creates research-based global content that helps enterprises understand localization, AI translation, and multilingual communication.

Learn about our editorial policies

Ivan Sokolov
Reviewed by
Ivan Sokolov

Ivan Sokolov is a Smartcat engineer and content contributor writing about translation solutions, localization strategy, and video game localization. His work bridges product, engineering, and localization education for global teams.

Learn about our editorial policies

Editorial standards

Why you can trust Smartcat

This comparison is written by our localization team, edited for clarity, and reviewed by a Smartcat solutions engineer before publishing. We describe other vendors from their own public documentation and pricing, and update the piece as those change.

  • Written and reviewed by localization practitioners
  • Competitor details taken from each vendor's public documentation and pricing
  • Updated when vendors change their features or pricing
Read our editorial standards
100+5 star reviews
★★★★★ G2 · 4.6 / 5
“This was one of our first AI investments. What used to take weeks now takes minutes — translation runs in parallel with everything else, and the marketing team owns it end-to-end.”
OS
Ollie Scheers

CTO at Huel

Keep reading

All posts →

How to ensure effective usage of Smartcat on a daily basis

Loie Favre

How Topcon scaled localization without a large localization team

Brittany Clark

When the Deadline Can't Move: 350 Pages in Four Days

Jane Strickland

See Smartcat

Translate everything, in every language your customers speak.

One platform for AI translation, human linguists, and the content systems you already use. Start with a demo, or spin up a free workspace.

Book a demo

Start free trial